The Notebook (2004)



A quiet, tender story behind a great love

The Notebook (2004)

Director: Nick Cassavetes
New Line Cinema

Reviewed by Popcorn and the Kernels - 6/15/05

I was prepared to like this movie, as it was referred to me by some Generation Y (born after 1978) women with whom I do business, and I usually like sentimental "chick flick" movies.  But I did not expect it to be so engaging.  For one thing, I did not realize until the credits started, that Rockford—er James Garner—was a principal character.

Or Gena Rowlands for that matter.

These two are such masters of the art of acting; anyone could have written the script or the book behind it.  Well, not quite.  The story is based on the novel by Nicholas Sparks (Message in a Bottle, A Walk to Remember), an ardent sentimentalist to be sure, but not a shameless wet-eye opportunist... though many critics seem to disagree with me on this point.

The story begins in a retirement-nursing home where Noah Calhoun (Garner) and some other members of the family visit with his sweetheart of many years Allie Calhoun (Rowlands), who has an Alzheimer's-like disease.  Though she thinks Noah is just one of the medical team, she enjoys it when he reads stories to her daily from his notebook.  Hence, the movie's title.

The story has conventional syrupy elements, and it is set in North Carolina near the sea.  Young Noah (Ryan Gosling) becomes thoroughly entranced with the young Allie (Rachel McAdams), but she's a rich girl with a protective mama (Joan Allen).  Their relationship is sealed by love during a romantic night at a classic old home Noah has inherited from his father, and then fixed up with years of hard work.

During the WWII years, Noah goes off and writes Allie a letter every day—much as he now reads to her daily—but Allie's mother intercepts and hides the letters (the bitch).  Allie, thinking Noah no longer cares, becomes engaged to another man.  Her fiancé is a great guy with all the social pedigree, but she really doesn't love him.  Ultimately, these matters sort themselves out, Allie finds the letters, and she and Noah find true love.

Then flash to the present time, in which Allie has suffered for a while with the mental darkness.  Noah (Garner) is constantly hoping to reach her, to see a sign of light, of recognition.  I don't want to give anything away here, but supposedly true Alzheimer's in its full measure does not let any light in.  The curtain closes irrevocably, which makes Alzheimer's the horrifying disease it is.

One of the reviews I read mentioned the movie Iris as a better story about true life with Alzheimer's, and the actors in that movie are also world class.  But you know what, I much prefer sloppy sentimentality to true grit in return for my entertainment dollar.  I recall once renting the movie, Wit, starring Emma Thompson.  Very good movie—a woman dies of cancer, blow by blow.  But I came away wanting to slit my wrists... and I'm pretty sure the people I convinced to watch it with me wanted to hand me the knife.

Life is too depressing already, so if we get a sugarcoated version of a near-miss Alzheimer's, who cares.  It's believable and conceivable.  Sad without being maudlin.  The stuff that love is made of.  Three puffs and a kernel from the Popcorn man.

Popcorn

from the Popcorn Gallery

Intergalactic Hyperchick-Kernels Starlight, Sunshine, and Moonbeam

 Commentary: Starlight 

Are some of the other critics right, and this was simply an opportunistic slobbering sentimental movie?

Well yes, I think the end WAS quite ‘over the top.'  But it aligns itself properly with the tenor of their long and powerfully close relationship.

How good/great are the performances by James Garner and Gena Rowlands, and what makes them so good?

What makes them so good is that they say so blessedly little!  Other than Noah's story-telling, their conversation is necessarily limited by the huge spaces in her memory.  Alzheimer's often exacts a terrific toll on the non-afflicted, care-taking spouse.  But Noah's quiet kindness is yet another manifestation of the depth of his love for Allie.

Comment on the relationship of young Noah with his poppa, Sam Sheppard.

Noah and his father (Sheppard) unashamedly love each other.  Blissfully unconcerned about living life outside the mainstream, this odd duet eats breakfast at dinnertime, reads poetry to each other on the front porch and openly demonstrates a vast affection for the other with hugs and gentle chiding.

Why do you suppose this movie was a sleeper in terms of popular appeal, and that so many younger people went for it?

The non-appeal of this movie to older people may have to do with their lower tolerance for fantasy.  Maybe they're more jaded about love.  After all, they're far more intimate with the harsh realities of aging than young people. They may actually resent seeing Alzheimer's romanticized to this degree.  Let's face it: baby-boomers are much closer to this scenario than Generation X and Y, because many of them are actively caring for a relative with senile dementia.  (These caretakers probably paid a sitter to care for their elderly charges so they could go see this movie.)

On the other hand, younger people went for this movie because of the sheer boldness of the non-conventional Noah and the spunky, spontaneous Allie.  Noah's outrageous antics in attracting this high-spirited girl, so clearly above his economic and cultural station, are a classic boy-meets-girl plot-device. The balance of power in this relationship is decidedly with Allie, not with her mother or father or fiancé.  Emancipated by the truth of Noah's enduring love and love letters, Allie has one final challenge to meet:  to know and pursue what SHE wants, not what her parents want for, or expect of, her.  If indeed this is the ‘chick-flick' that so many critics are claiming, it is because a great many ‘chicks' nowadays face identical dilemmas.

Do you think the producers had a solid feel for the setting, with the old home being fixed up, Carolina coastal town, any symbolism in the house he built for Allie?

Not knowing much about southern coastal towns, I nonetheless felt that Noah was attempting to maintain something important from the past, some roots, some sense of permanence grounded in history, mixed with his own effort and sweat (and that of his father's).  And even though this house held an attraction to Noah that pre-dated Allie, once the two had their first intimate night on its creaky old floor, the house became an obsession with him.  The extent to which Noah could ‘preserve' it was the extent to which he could hold on her.


 Commentary: Sunshine 

Comment on the relationship of young Noah with his poppa, Sam Sheppard. 
Any symbolism in the house he built for Allie?

Noah's poppa was his rock -- the wise, dependable, easygoing, unpretentious sort of man every kid secretly wants for a dad. A positive thinker of few words and modest means, he was grateful for the blessings he did have, especially Noah.  He gave his son both roots and wings, along with old-fashioned values and a belief in solid foundations:  Well-built structures, like well-built character, endure and reward.  Thus, Noah forged his future home as carefully and lovingly as he'd forged his personal relationships, especially with his true love Allie.  Despite a painful setback, he ultimately won her.  Together they lived, loved, raised a family and happily grew old in the house-that-Noah-built.... until a mysterious robber stole Allie's most precious possession.

Are some of the other critics right, that this was simply an opportunistic slobbering sentimental movie?

One of those critics was sitting right next to me.  After sleeping through half of it, he dismissed The Notebook as "a  nice little fairy tale".  Not a bad assessment, except I wasn't quite so willing to blow it off that fast.

After all, once upon a time, fairy tales sustained us, maybe even shaped us.  If nothing else, they certainly entertained and provided our earliest imaginative stimuli -- all kinds of unique and fanciful stories, with magnificent heroes and ugly villains variously masquerading as animals, dwarfs, hags, monsters, bitches (i.e. Allie's mom!), royalty or ordinary boys and girls -- in all kinds of dangerous situations or moral quandaries.  Each tale was fraught with symbolism and included the subtle message that innocence prevails, coincidences abound, and good guys live happily ever after.

Now, admit it.  Every so often, stuff like this actually happens in real life too.  Even if it didn't, man does not live by protein alone -- a little schmaltz is essential to every diet.  Three puffs.


 Commentary: Moonbeam 

Gee, after reading Popcorn's review, I WANT TO COMMENT TOO, but I didn't see the movie! (I'll definitely rent it -- and a few others I've missed -- as soon as I'm caught up with my home project.)  Yet, without having seen this, and only from your review, I'll bet I know why this is a sleeper, popular with "the younger crowd."  With all the action-packed, high-tech, dazzling audio and visual effects movies on the scene nowadays, people of all ages are starved for some old-fashioned romance, some sentimentality, some reaffirmation of quiet, steady, deep bonds and emotion (aka love) that LASTS, through thick and thin, through health and sickness, through youth and old age.  And maybe, as you point out, with awareness of Alzheimer's on the rise, there IS a message of hope there that viewers are desperately grabbing onto.

[Through the magic of modern technology, Moonbeam gets her comment anyway.  -  Ed]

And a word from some sponsors . . .